Papers with text evaluation
HoWToBench: Holistic Evaluation for LLM’s Capability in Human-level Writing using Tree of Writing (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Yu Luo, Lin Fan, Irene Zhou, Zikang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Evaluating the writing capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge due to the multidimensional nature of writing skills and the limitations of existing metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to model the aggregation weights of sub-features in a tree-structured workflow and propose a Chinese writing benchmark that mitigates biases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tree-of-writing (ToW) measures the writing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in Chinese and shows that it mitigates biases and achieves a *0.93* Pearson correlation with human judgments. |
GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desire (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for text generation are not adequate to assess the quality of the generated outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that utilizes emergent abilities of generative pre-trained models to evaluate generated texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework can achieve what one desires to evaluate for texts simply by natural language instructions. |
HPSS: Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search for LLM Evaluators (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Bosi Wen, Pei Ke, Yufei Sun, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Jinfeng Zhou, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to optimize text evaluation prompts neglect the combinatorial impact of multiple factors, leading to insufficient optimization of the evaluation pipeline. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate 8 key factors for evaluation prompts and integrate them into an algorithm that searches for well-behaved prompting strategies for LLM evaluators. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods and human-designed evaluation prompts on four evaluation tasks. |